Vol. 68, Issue 24
View more issues of The Valued Voice
Sign Up for WHA's Newsletter
Click here to view past issues
IN THIS ISSUE
- WHA Spotlights Scope of Insurer and Middlemen Consolidation in Letter to HHS, FTC
- GAO Recommends CMS Enhance Prior Authorization Oversight in Medicaid Managed Care
- WHA-Backed Federal Prior Auth Legislation Reintroduced as New GAO Report Exposes Further Prior Auth Abuse
- WHA Expresses Concerns with Continued Inadequate Payment Updates in 2025 Proposed Inpatient Rule
- Health Care Emergency Readiness Planning: Innovations in Health Care Surge Capacity Management
- WHA Information Center Welcomes New Employee, Phyo Aung
- Another Successful Year for the WHA Health Care Leadership Academy as it Graduates Latest Cohort
EDUCATION EVENTS
Apr. 9, 2025
2025 Advocacy DayApr. 22, 2025
Nursing ServicesMay. 14, 2025
2025 WHA Workforce ForumClick here to view quality event calendar
View more issues of The Valued Voice
Sign Up for WHA's Newsletter
Thursday, June 13, 2024
GAO Recommends CMS Enhance Prior Authorization Oversight in Medicaid Managed Care
A new report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) concludes that CMS should take steps to improve its oversight of the appropriateness of Medicaid managed care prior authorization decisions, particularly for services required under Medicaid’s Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit. The EPSDT benefit provides a range of preventive health care services for Medicaid enrollees under the age of 21.
“Reviewing plans’ prior authorization decisions to ensure that medically necessary services are approved is important because plans may have financial incentives that could lead them to inappropriately limit access to services, including EPSDT services,” GAO wrote in the report.
While the study focused on the EPSDT benefit, GAO found that CMS oversight of Medicaid managed care prior authorizations overall focuses on the plans’ prior authorization processes, but not the appropriateness of the final decisions. The report found that managed care plans often have inconsistent prior authorization requirements for specific services across states, and although states must oversee managed care plans, none of the states selected for the report assessed a representative sample of denials to evaluate the appropriateness of the prior authorization decisions.
In its review, GAO cited previous reports from the federal Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General which found a high number of denied prior authorizations by some plans and limited oversight of prior authorization denials in most states. Similarly, GAO reported, it found that monitoring of prior authorization decisions for EPSDT services was limited in the states selected for review.
GAO concludes that CMS and states would benefit from systematic efforts to monitor managed care plans’ prior authorization decisions and clarity on which services prior authorization requirements may be imposed so that they can know whether children are receiving the health care services they need.
“Reviewing plans’ prior authorization decisions to ensure that medically necessary services are approved is important because plans may have financial incentives that could lead them to inappropriately limit access to services, including EPSDT services,” GAO wrote in the report.
While the study focused on the EPSDT benefit, GAO found that CMS oversight of Medicaid managed care prior authorizations overall focuses on the plans’ prior authorization processes, but not the appropriateness of the final decisions. The report found that managed care plans often have inconsistent prior authorization requirements for specific services across states, and although states must oversee managed care plans, none of the states selected for the report assessed a representative sample of denials to evaluate the appropriateness of the prior authorization decisions.
In its review, GAO cited previous reports from the federal Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General which found a high number of denied prior authorizations by some plans and limited oversight of prior authorization denials in most states. Similarly, GAO reported, it found that monitoring of prior authorization decisions for EPSDT services was limited in the states selected for review.
GAO concludes that CMS and states would benefit from systematic efforts to monitor managed care plans’ prior authorization decisions and clarity on which services prior authorization requirements may be imposed so that they can know whether children are receiving the health care services they need.